Concentric

Agreeableness

Cooperation

How far you go to avoid friction and accommodate others in a disagreement.

Why it is measured

Conflict behaviour is separable from how warmly you feel toward people.

What a high or low score looks like

High scorers yield and smooth things over. Low scorers hold their position.

Why it matters

Another conduct facet, predicted to stay steady across relationships — which makes it a useful control on whether the other facets really do change.

The items behind it

Four public-domain statements, answered on a five-point scale. Items marked − are reverse keyed: agreeing with them counts against the trait, which is what stops agreeing with everything from producing a high score.

  • -Love a good fight
  • -Yell at people
  • -Insult people
  • -Get back at others

Four items is not many. A facet measured this way carries real uncertainty, which is why every score on this site is reported as a range rather than a single number.

How this one changes with closeness

This is one of the traits asked four times over — once for each level of closeness, from your inner circle out to strangers. Our prediction for it: flat.

CONTROL. Conflict conduct rather than affect.

  • +I look for a compromise when I disagree with ⟨group⟩.
  • -I hold my ground in a dispute with ⟨group⟩.
  • +I try to smooth over conflict with ⟨group⟩.

⟨group⟩ is replaced by each of the four closeness anchors in turn.