Agreeableness
Cooperation
How far you go to avoid friction and accommodate others in a disagreement.
Why it is measured
Conflict behaviour is separable from how warmly you feel toward people.
What a high or low score looks like
High scorers yield and smooth things over. Low scorers hold their position.
Why it matters
Another conduct facet, predicted to stay steady across relationships — which makes it a useful control on whether the other facets really do change.
The items behind it
Four public-domain statements, answered on a five-point scale. Items marked − are reverse keyed: agreeing with them counts against the trait, which is what stops agreeing with everything from producing a high score.
- -Love a good fight
- -Yell at people
- -Insult people
- -Get back at others
Four items is not many. A facet measured this way carries real uncertainty, which is why every score on this site is reported as a range rather than a single number.
How this one changes with closeness
This is one of the traits asked four times over — once for each level of closeness, from your inner circle out to strangers. Our prediction for it: flat.
CONTROL. Conflict conduct rather than affect.
- +I look for a compromise when I disagree with ⟨group⟩.
- -I hold my ground in a dispute with ⟨group⟩.
- +I try to smooth over conflict with ⟨group⟩.
⟨group⟩ is replaced by each of the four closeness anchors in turn.