Concentric

Agreeableness

Trust

Whether you assume other people mean well.

Why it is measured

A basic stance toward others that shapes almost every interaction before it begins.

What a high or low score looks like

High scorers assume good faith. Low scorers assume self-interest and stay watchful.

Why it matters

One of the facets most likely to depend on who is being trusted — which is exactly what this project measures.

The items behind it

Four public-domain statements, answered on a five-point scale. Items marked − are reverse keyed: agreeing with them counts against the trait, which is what stops agreeing with everything from producing a high score.

  • +Trust others
  • +Believe that others have good intentions
  • +Trust what people say
  • -Distrust people

Four items is not many. A facet measured this way carries real uncertainty, which is why every score on this site is reported as a range rather than a single number.

How this one changes with closeness

This is one of the traits asked four times over — once for each level of closeness, from your inner circle out to strangers. Our prediction for it: steep.

An affective stance rather than a rule. Expected to gate sharply on closeness.

  • +I assume ⟨group⟩ have good intentions.
  • +I take ⟨group⟩ at their word.
  • -I expect ⟨group⟩ to let me down.

⟨group⟩ is replaced by each of the four closeness anchors in turn.