Agreeableness
Trust
Whether you assume other people mean well.
Why it is measured
A basic stance toward others that shapes almost every interaction before it begins.
What a high or low score looks like
High scorers assume good faith. Low scorers assume self-interest and stay watchful.
Why it matters
One of the facets most likely to depend on who is being trusted — which is exactly what this project measures.
The items behind it
Four public-domain statements, answered on a five-point scale. Items marked − are reverse keyed: agreeing with them counts against the trait, which is what stops agreeing with everything from producing a high score.
- +Trust others
- +Believe that others have good intentions
- +Trust what people say
- -Distrust people
Four items is not many. A facet measured this way carries real uncertainty, which is why every score on this site is reported as a range rather than a single number.
How this one changes with closeness
This is one of the traits asked four times over — once for each level of closeness, from your inner circle out to strangers. Our prediction for it: steep.
An affective stance rather than a rule. Expected to gate sharply on closeness.
- +I assume ⟨group⟩ have good intentions.
- +I take ⟨group⟩ at their word.
- -I expect ⟨group⟩ to let me down.
⟨group⟩ is replaced by each of the four closeness anchors in turn.