Concentric

Agreeableness

Morality

How straightforward you are — how little you use pretence, flattery or manipulation.

Why it is measured

Candour is separable from warmth. Blunt people can be kind, and charming people can be evasive.

What a high or low score looks like

High scorers are frank and dislike guile. Low scorers are comfortable with strategic presentation.

Why it matters

This reads as a conduct rule rather than a feeling, which is why we predict it stays roughly constant regardless of who you are dealing with.

The items behind it

Four public-domain statements, answered on a five-point scale. Items marked − are reverse keyed: agreeing with them counts against the trait, which is what stops agreeing with everything from producing a high score.

  • -Use others for my own ends
  • -Cheat to get ahead
  • -Take advantage of others
  • -Obstruct others' plans

Four items is not many. A facet measured this way carries real uncertainty, which is why every score on this site is reported as a range rather than a single number.

How this one changes with closeness

This is one of the traits asked four times over — once for each level of closeness, from your inner circle out to strangers. Our prediction for it: flat.

CONTROL. A conduct rule, applied uniformly. If this gates as much as Altruism, H1 is false.

  • +I am honest with ⟨group⟩, even when it costs me.
  • -I would mislead ⟨group⟩ to get what I want.
  • +I keep my word to ⟨group⟩.

⟨group⟩ is replaced by each of the four closeness anchors in turn.