Concentric

Agreeableness

Sympathy

How much you feel other people’s difficulties as if they were partly your own.

Why it is measured

Feeling with someone is separable from acting for them — and the two often come apart.

What a high or low score looks like

High scorers are moved by suffering. Low scorers register it without being pulled by it.

Why it matters

Low Sympathy alongside high Dutifulness is a specific and common profile: consistent care driven by obligation and principle rather than by vicarious feeling.

The items behind it

Four public-domain statements, answered on a five-point scale. Items marked − are reverse keyed: agreeing with them counts against the trait, which is what stops agreeing with everything from producing a high score.

  • +Sympathize with the homeless
  • +Feel sympathy for those who are worse off than myself
  • -Am not interested in other people's problems
  • -Try not to think about the needy

Four items is not many. A facet measured this way carries real uncertainty, which is why every score on this site is reported as a range rather than a single number.

How this one changes with closeness

This is one of the traits asked four times over — once for each level of closeness, from your inner circle out to strangers. Our prediction for it: steep.

Vicarious feeling, which plausibly requires a relationship to activate at all.

  • +I feel it in myself when ⟨group⟩ are hurting.
  • +I am moved by the troubles of ⟨group⟩.
  • -I stay unaffected when ⟨group⟩ are upset.

⟨group⟩ is replaced by each of the four closeness anchors in turn.